[sigcomm] attendance policies for SIGCOMM-affiliated events
Greg Minshall
minshall at acm.org
Wed Oct 26 06:14:06 PDT 2005
my thoughts:
a) one of SIGCOMM's roles is to support the networking research community.
(we do that, for example, by providing access to SIGCOMM publications in
the ACM Digital Library free of charge). the "networking research
community" overlaps with SIGCOMM membership.
b) closed, small, workshops are very important for the research community.
(i've seen "small" up to 60 or so people.)
(therefore, I support SIGCOMM supporting some by-invitation-only workshops.)
c) in terms of who gets invited, i'd leave it up to the organizing
committee, but *my* default would be: authors of accepted papers (ambiguity
of primary or all secondary); PC; primary authors of rejected papers,
assuming the rejected paper had a clue; other invitees (this last class to
make up < 10 % of the total attendees). (somebody mentioned "all the
students you can squeeze in", which I reject: hopefully, students will be
authors of papers.)
cheers, Greg
p.s., years ago Scott Brim of Cisco was ruminating about the IETF, now
versus then, and said something like, "before, we tried to do what was
good, and now, we try to do what is 'right'; the latter is much harder."
More information about the sigcomm
mailing list