[sigcomm] attendance policies for SIGCOMM-affiliated events
Scott Shenker
shenker at icsi.berkeley.edu
Wed Nov 9 09:00:02 PST 2005
There's no doubt that some of the issues we are discussing here are
important, but I think we've ignored part of the story. A few years
ago, Larry and David came up with the idea of creating a new kind of
networking conference that became Hotnets. I don't think anyone can
reasonably question that Hotnets has been of great benefit to the
field as a whole in terms of spurring discussions of new topics and
new approaches; many people (myself included) consider it to be the
most interesting networking conference our community has. Moreover,
I don't think Hotnets, at least not in recent years, has been a
significant drain on SIGCOMM resources (Jen, please correct me if I'm
wrong), nor do I think there have been cases of discretion-abuse by
the PC chairs. All in all, there seems little doubt that Hotnets has
been a huge plus for the community. I hope, in all our complaining,
we don't forget all the good that has come from Hotnets, nor forget
to thank Larry and David for taking the initiative to do something of
great benefit for the community. Given its focus on gripes, not
gratitude, I'd say the discussion on this list only reinforces the
maxim that no good deed goes unpunished.
More information about the sigcomm
mailing list