[e2e] userlevel TCP diagnostics
Bob Braden
braden at ISI.EDU
Wed Sep 27 11:30:46 PDT 2006
It was my impression that there was quite a bit of published work on
this over the past 20 years. I think that Allison Mankin did some
work on it, in a former life.
Bob Braden
*> From: mort <mort at ieee.org>
*> To: end2end-interest at postel.org
*> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
*> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7dbd93f233f447dc
*> X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
*> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:18:19 -0700
*> Subject: [e2e] userlevel TCP diagnostics
*> List-Id: discussion of end-2-end research and design principles
*> <end2end-interest.postel.org>
*>
*> hi,
*>
*> upon reading RFC 675 recently, i came across the following text:
*>
*> """
*> 5. NETWORK MEASUREMENT PLANS FOR TCP
*>
*> 5.1 USERLEVEL DIAGNOSTICS
*>
*> We have in mind a program which will exercise a given TCP, causing it
*> to cycle through a number of states; opening, closing, and
*> transmitting on a variety of connections. This program will collect
*> statistics and will generally try to detect deviation from TCP
*> functional specifications. Clearly there will have to be a copy of
*> this program both at the local site being tested and some site which
*> has a certified TCP. So we will have to produce a specification for
*> this user level diagnostic program also.
*>
*> There needs to be a master and a slave side to all this so the master
*> can tell the slave what's going wrong with the test.
*> """
*>
*> ...a precursor to a self-managed Internet perhaps :)
*>
*> anyway, I was wondering if anyone could tell me whether this
*> program/service was ever implemented and deployed, and whether it was
*> reported anywhere? (and if not, why not?)
*>
*> thanks,
*>
*> R.
*>
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list