[e2e] Are Packet Trains / Packet Bursts a Problem in TCP?
Detlef Bosau
detlef.bosau at web.de
Tue Sep 26 10:57:27 PDT 2006
rick jones wrote:
>
> Maybe I'm trying to pick a nit, but was the underlying problem that it
> was bursty in the initial transmission, or was the underlying problem
> really that it continued to retransmit the bursts, without any (IIRC)
> exponential backoff?
That´s a good question :-) Therefore I placed my initial posting here: I
read a lot of things about "burstiness". And even more about numerous
ways to describe this burstiness. For me, it would be helpful to get an
idea where burstiness stems from.
E.g.:
- mircobursts which stem from probing during an exponential slow start.
- bursts wich stem from senders which continously retrnsmit dropped
packets "synchronously"
. ...
At least when burstiness becomes an issue, I believe its easier to avoid
burstiness, or to alleviate, when we know the reasons for burstiness.
Detlef
>
> rick jones
> Wisdom teeth are impacted, people are affected by the effects of events
>
More information about the end2end-interest
mailing list