[rbridge] When would an RBridge say "I don't want layer 2 multicast"?

[Joe Touch]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

AOK - I'd like to make a motion to remove the bit.

I'd like to encourage a quick check that all other bits have clear
indications as to when an administrator would want to set/clear them,
based on either existing practice or specific guidance.

I.e., it should be more than just saying "here's what the bit does".

Thanks, all, for the exchange on this.

Joe

James Carlson wrote:
> Dinesh G Dutt writes:
>> I checked and we don't need this bit. It was something that was put in 
>> for use in a network where MMRP was widely deployed, kind of thing. But 
>> as you pointed out, we can prune multicast effectively using the normal 
>> multicast pruning and don't need this bit.
> 
> ... and I'm happy with or without the bit.  It's not important.
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkoxdcwACgkQE5f5cImnZrvORgCgsVyQ9YqKzTS+NFQ8zR1rOUO9
mqUAoO1vS3uNDjcWgzk/NzWG1aPYLElL
=9mB0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----