[rbridge] When would an RBridge say "I don't want layer 2 multicast"?

[Joe Touch]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Radia Perlman wrote:
> There's currently a flag in an LSP for an RBridge to say "don't send me 
> layer 2 multicasts that aren't
> derived from IP multicasts".
> 
> Would this ever be used? Can all layer 2 non-IP-derived multicasts 
> really be lumped into the same
> bucket and turned on and off as a unit?

It might be useful not to make any assumptions about future use of L2
non-IP-derived mcast. Someone might come up with something that will
then break over rbridges, and that doesn't sound like a win...

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkooVl8ACgkQE5f5cImnZrt3OQCfeFr388KqsxmyZ7LJ/KRvvDJ2
xHoAnRI5EW8dPYLtGEZzC1iQTVSYR6gq
=Elnj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----