[rbridge] wglc comment - editorial

[Donald Eastlake]

Hi Jeff,

Your comment below on where the optional link size LSP information
would go seems reasonable. I think it's also reasonable to mention
this in 4.2.4.4.

Thanks,
Donald

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Jeff Pickering<jeffpick at broadcom.com> wrote:
>
> Section 4.3.2
>
>
>    "If size X succeeds, and X > Sz, then RB1
>
>    advertises the largest tested X in RB1's LAN Hello, and RB1 MAY
>
>    advertise X as an attribute of the link to RB2 in RB1's LSP."
>
>
>
>
>
> Im assuming the LSP info described goes into a sub-tlv of the wide
>
> metrics ISN link. If so, should this be mentioned in section 4.2.4.4?
>
> _______________________________________________
> rbridge mailing list
> rbridge at postel.org
> http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge
>
>