[rbridge] potential L2 forwarding loop issue in RBridges
james.d.carlson at Sun.COM
Thu Feb 19 11:55:20 PST 2009
Donald Eastlake writes:
> Native frame loop safety Hellos: Sent as in the current Draft on the
> Designated VLAN and possibly many others. Have the same IS PDU type
> and fixed header fields as adjacency Hello but only have the
> additional data needed for loop safety. In particular, only items 1,
> 2, and 4 from the current section 18.104.22.168.2 and do not have an IS
> Neighbor TLV and do not have padding.
> Does the above seem reasonable as a starting point?
You won't be able to avoid including (5) from the current 22.214.171.124.2,
because it's in the same sub-TLV with the rest, but, yes, that sounds
reasonable to me.
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
More information about the rbridge