[rbridge] Consensus Check: Configure ports to disable end stationtraffic

Joe Touch touch at ISI.EDU
Mon Jan 7 11:32:24 PST 2008


I'm concerned about the case where an end station moves and doesn't 
announce itself. There's no requirement in ethernet to do so, and such a 
station would never be discovered if we don't flood broadcast to all links.

I.e., the optimization below is a recipe for ARP failure in such cases. 
I disagree with it.

Joe

Anoop Ghanwani wrote:
> This certainly makes sense is what I tend to
> think of as a TRILL "core" port.   On such a 
> port, we would never see non-TRILL encap'ed
> frames (other than the usual exceptions such
> as BPDUs and other link layer control traffic).
> 
> I wonder if it makes sense to also have a 
> configuration for a TRILL "edge" port -- one
> where we are configured to never send TRILL
> encap'ed traffic because we don't intend for 
> it to be used as a transit link (even though
> connectivity may exist to another RBridge 
> for redundancy purposes).  
> 
> Anoop 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rbridge-bounces at postel.org 
>> [mailto:rbridge-bounces at postel.org] On Behalf Of Eastlake III 
>> Donald-LDE008
>> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 10:34 AM
>> To: Rbridge at postel.org
>> Subject: [rbridge] Consensus Check: Configure ports to 
>> disable end stationtraffic
>>
>> This is a check via the mailing list to confirm or refute an 
>> apparent consensus at the Vancouver meeting taken from the 
>> minutes of that
>> meeting:
>>
>>            Currently broadcast, unknown unicast, and
>>       non-IP-derived multicast frames are output to all links. This is
>>       wasteful if there are no end stations on the link. Provide that
>>       a port can be configured so as to be disabled for end station
>>       traffic.
>>
>> If no particular controversy arises over this in the next 
>> three weeks, We will declare it to be the working group consensus.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Donald & Erik
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rbridge mailing list
>> rbridge at postel.org
>> http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rbridge mailing list
> rbridge at postel.org
> http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/rbridge/attachments/20080107/fa55a4ba/signature.bin


More information about the rbridge mailing list