[rbridge] Proposed changes to the architecture based on IETF-70...

James Carlson james.d.carlson at sun.com
Fri Feb 22 06:48:12 PST 2008


Eric Gray writes:
> Several people pointed out that the architecture should not assume a
> DRB election process will be used.  This is technically correct, and
> - for that reason - not directly something that needs consensus to
> change, at least in theory.

Could someone please post the problem statement?  Besides just making
the DRB election "optional," I think it'd be good to have a summary
statement of what problem is solved by making it possible to run
without DRB election.

(I'm guessing this was discussed somewhere ... but I wasn't able to
locate it in the archives.)

-- 
James Carlson, Solaris Networking              <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive        71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677


More information about the rbridge mailing list