[rbridge] Consensus Check: Point to Point links

Joe Touch touch at ISI.EDU
Fri Oct 5 18:00:38 PDT 2007



Silvano Gai wrote:
> Joe,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Joe Touch [mailto:touch at ISI.EDU]
>> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 5:23 PM
>> To: Silvano Gai
>> Cc: Eastlake III Donald-LDE008; Radia Perlman; Rbridge at postel.org
>> Subject: Re: [rbridge] Consensus Check: Point to Point links
>>
>>
>>
>> Silvano Gai wrote:
>>> Joe,
>>>
>>> If there is a bridge in between two RBridges you need to have a full
>>> adjacency table.
>>>
>>> If the link is point to point, you can save the table.
>> If the link is point to point, I still need to know what to send over
>> the link, so each side still needs adjacency information.
> 
> 
> This is not correct; you need to do a lookup to find the port, that is
> it.
> Otherwise you need to do a lookup to find the MAC address, rewrite the
> MAC address and then another lookup to find the port.

So what do I save again? Yes, on the rewriting and additional lookup.
But space?

Joe

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/rbridge/attachments/20071005/7b1e62bd/signature.bin


More information about the rbridge mailing list