[rbridge] Consensus Check: Point to Point links

[Joe Touch]

Radia Perlman wrote:
...
> So I'd prefer not having this feature at all, since I don't understand
> its purpose, 

I would really like the purpose to be explained before we explore
alternative solutions. And when I say purpose, I mean:

	- why the IETF rbridge WG should be addressing this issue now

vs., e.g., the IEEE, for some future link technology, now or in the future.

Joe

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/rbridge/attachments/20071005/df7c6951/signature.bin