[rbridge] Can we ever have pt-to-pt links?

[Russ White]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


>> The only thing special we were doing with the pseudonode was reporting
>> the bridge root.
>> So that means that R1, the DRB, would report the root bridge ID in its
>> LSP if
>> R1 has decided not to create a pseudonode.
>>
> Actually, let me change that to: "Let's always report the root bridge ID
> in the DRB's
> LSP, not the pseudonode LSP"
>
> So I'm getting more comfortable with that proposal -- the DRB only
> declares a pseudonode
> if there really are too many neighbors, and switching over from
> non-pseudonode to
> pseudnode is really not very disruptive.

In most implementations of IS-IS, there is a way to manually configured
a link as point-to-point, no matter what the layer 2 part of the device
thinks it is. The IS-IS WG pretty much eschewed auto-detection schemes
when we went through this exercise.

:-)

Russ

- --
riw at cisco.com CCIE <>< Grace Alone

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHMHu0ER27sUhU9OQRAgyEAKC3ic9tS1kROaWxVSWuwnrr2HUh9gCeJJss
wNbLsz14yV/oQ3FCO6Xh2Pg=
=vYAd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----