[rbridge] IP Multicast groups/ layer 2 or layer 3?
Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
eric.gray at ericsson.com
Mon Jan 8 13:15:11 PST 2007
Radia,
In my opinion, it should be a Layer 2 address.
--
Eric
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rbridge-bounces at postel.org
> [mailto:rbridge-bounces at postel.org] On Behalf Of Radia Perlman
> Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 8:21 PM
> To: rbridge at postel.org
> Subject: [rbridge] IP Multicast groups/ layer 2 or layer 3?
>
> When an RBridge R announces via IS-IS which IP multicast groups are
> reachable on R's directly
> attached links, should the groups be layer 3 or layer 2 addresses?
>
> If it's layer 3, then there will have to be separate
> announcements for
> IPv4 and IPv6 groups.
> If it's layer 2, then 32 IPv4 groups would map to the same layer 2
> multicast address (and I'm
> not sure what it is for IPv6).
>
> I don't care. The spec currently says layer 2, but there is a
> question
> in the spec asking if that's what
> we really want.
>
> Radia
>
> _______________________________________________
> rbridge mailing list
> rbridge at postel.org
> http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge
>
More information about the rbridge
mailing list