[rbridge] TTL only - was RE: New fields in shim header?
touch at ISI.EDU
Fri Oct 13 07:08:45 PDT 2006
Ed Bowen wrote:
> Joe Touch <touch at ISI.EDU> wrote on 10/12/2006 04:52:43 PM:
>> Silvano Gai wrote:
>> > Joe,
>> > IMHO TRILL will be valuable in HPC and Datacenters, where high
>> > bisectional bandwidth is a must, and in Enterprise Backbone.
>> Sure, but that's not the only place they will be deployed. Please review
>> the P&AS.
> What is the operational experience that indicates the requirement for
> the other environments? I am not aware of anyone who plans to install
> TRILL outside of the environment Silvano outlines. What need would
> motivate these additional environments?
TRILL applies anytime the cross-section bandwidth of a set of deployed
bridges is constrained because of the spanning tree algorithm rather
than the link capacity.
Again, please review the problem and applicability statement and the
working group charter.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://mailman.postel.org/pipermail/rbridge/attachments/20061013/e873dad9/signature.bin
More information about the rbridge