[rbridge] Draft minutes posted

[Guillermo Ibáñez]

There is no TTL field on the 802.1ah, afaik, so the .1ah would require 
modification.
Guillermo

Ali Sajassi (sajassi) escribió:
>  
> 
> 
> Yes, if there is any reason as to why .1ah encap cannot be used, then I
> would like to hear it.
> 
> -Ali 
> 
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rbridge-bounces at postel.org 
>> [mailto:rbridge-bounces at postel.org] On Behalf Of Don Fedyk
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 10:17 AM
>> To: Developing a hybrid router/bridge.
>> Subject: Re: [rbridge] Draft minutes posted
>>
>> Hi Erik
>>
>> In the minutes: 
>> 802.1ah header synergy?  On this point myself, and I recall 
>> Ali Sajassi and Donald Oconnor all stood up and said that 
>> 802.1ah is going to be a standard encapsulation header. My 
>> point was Trill should see what it could deliver on this 
>> encapsulation before inventing similar but different headers.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Don  
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: rbridge-bounces at postel.org
>>> At http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06nov/minutes/trill.txt
>>>
>>> Any corrections?
>>>
>>>     Erik
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rbridge mailing list
>> rbridge at postel.org
>> http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rbridge mailing list
> rbridge at postel.org
> http://mailman.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge
>