[rbridge] R-Bridge Routing Requirements draft is now availabl e

[Gray, Eric]

Peter,

	I can certainly add this as a separate subsection under 
section 3.  In my own mind (wherever I misplaced it), I do not
think there is a clear distinction between per-ingress and the
combination of per-ingress and per-VLAN, but not everybody is
going to think of VLAN IDs as part of a logical interface ID.

--
Eric

--> -----Original Message-----
--> From: rbridge-bounces at postel.org 
--> [mailto:rbridge-bounces at postel.org]On
--> Behalf Of Peter Ashwood-Smith
--> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 10:47 AM
--> To: Developing a hybrid router/bridge.
--> Subject: Re: [rbridge] R-Bridge Routing Requirements draft is now
--> available
--> 
--> 
--> 
--> For completeness in section "3. Issues", there is of course the
--> possibility of
--> Per-ingress/Per VLAN spanning trees.
--> 
--> Peter
--> 
--> > -----Original Message-----
--> > From: rbridge-bounces at postel.org 
--> > [mailto:rbridge-bounces at postel.org] On Behalf Of Gray, Eric
--> > Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 5:56 PM
--> > To: 'Developing a hybrid router/bridge.'
--> > Subject: [rbridge] R-Bridge Routing Requirements draft is now 
--> > available
--> > 
--> > 
--> > The draft "Routing Requirements in Support of R-Bridges" - 
--> > submitted last 
--> > Friday - is now available at:
--> > 
-->
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gray-rbridge-routing-reqs-00.txt

This draft borrows heavily from the earlier draft-perlman-rbridge-03.txt
and is very preliminary.  I am looking for input for the various
sections
- particularly those that currently only contain "TBD" :-)

This was one of the drafts that the working group felt would be required
at the last meeting.

--
Eric Gray
_______________________________________________
rbridge mailing list
rbridge at postel.org http://www.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge

_______________________________________________
rbridge mailing list
rbridge at postel.org
http://www.postel.org/mailman/listinfo/rbridge