<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
After some additional thinking: "Fair dropping" is exactly what we
attempt to do in the moment.<br>
<br>
However, VJCC and flavours affect the <i>throughput</i><i> </i>while
the decongestion work affekts the <i>goodput</i>. <br>
<br>
So both solutions will encounter the same difficulties, however
one of them is cheaper. <br>
<br>
O.k., workshop paper, that's fine. That's the purpose of
workshops: Gather ideas, present them, assess them.<br>
<br>
DB<br>
<br>
Am 04.04.2013 13:31, schrieb Detlef Bosau:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:515D6474.909@web.de" type="cite">Simple
question. Where is "fair dropping" that different from "fair
queueing"?
<br>
<br>
I'm with you that we try to obviate the need of some reasonable
resource management in the Internet. However: When you require
some "fair dropping" mechanism, you could simply use the same
implementation and instead of scheduling n flows in a round robin
manner like this: "Each turn, one flow is served and n-1 packets
are dropped" frame as "Each turn, one flow is served and the other
n-1 flows wait." And then you have the fair queueing approach
which already well exists. And which you reject because it would
be too expensive.
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Detlef Bosau
Galileistraße 30
70565 Stuttgart Tel.: +49 711 5208031
mobile: +49 172 6819937
skype: detlef.bosau
ICQ: 566129673
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:detlef.bosau@web.de">detlef.bosau@web.de</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.detlef-bosau.de">http://www.detlef-bosau.de</a>
</pre>
</body>
</html>