<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 02.01.2013 03:43, schrieb Clark
Gaylord:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:20130102024321.057AC8E0090@frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
Don't be daft: there's no mystery about how you get 4 sec
latencies. Someone is holding it! </blockquote>
<br>
Really! Why didn't I see this before.....<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:20130102024321.057AC8E0090@frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa"
type="cite">That's the point -- drop the damn packet already! </blockquote>
<br>
Absolutely. We should always discard slow packets. Latencies become
so neat that way.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:20130102024321.057AC8E0090@frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa"
type="cite">If the service time for your queue is beyond some
small-ish.number -- measured in maybe tens of ms, you aren't doing
anyone(*) any favors.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I strongly think, that your perspective is a bit oversimplified
here....<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:20130102024321.057AC8E0090@frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa"
type="cite">--ckg<br>
<br>
(*) except your router vendor, who already is chuckling all the
way to the bank for the over-engineered crap you force him to sell
you<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
That's the other extreme of course. The truth will be - as often -
in between.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>