<br>All testing results related to CUBIC are available at <a href="http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/wiki/index.php/TCP_Testing">http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/wiki/index.php/TCP_Testing</a>.<br>You can click each of testing run.<br>
<br>Some of highlights are:<br><br>Internet2 testing results (BIC, CUBIC, HTCP, HSTCP and STCP)<br><a href="http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/wiki/index.php/Testing_between_Korea_and_Japan">http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/wiki/index.php/Testing_between_Korea_and_Japan</a><br>
<br>Intra-protocol testing results (CUBIC, HTCP, HSTCP and TCP-SACK)<br><a href="http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/wiki/index.php/Intra_protocol_fairness_testing_with_kernel_2.6.18-rc4">http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/wiki/index.php/Intra_protocol_fairness_testing_with_kernel_2.6.18-rc4</a><br>
<br>TCP-friendliness testing results (CUBIC, HTCP, and HSTCP)<br><a href="http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/wiki/index.php/TCP_friendliness_testing_with_kernel_2.6.18-rc4">http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/wiki/index.php/TCP_friendliness_testing_with_kernel_2.6.18-rc4</a><br>
<br>Spare capacity testing results (CUBIC, HTCP, HSTCP and TCP-SACK)<br><a href="http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/wiki/index.php/Spare_capacity_usage_testing_with_kernel_2.6.18-rc4">http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/wiki/index.php/Spare_capacity_usage_testing_with_kernel_2.6.18-rc4</a><br>
<br>Impact of background traffic results (CUBIC, HTCP, HSTCP and TCP-SACK)<br><a href="http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/wiki/index.php/Impact_of_background_traffic_testing_with_kernel_2.6.18-rc4">http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/wiki/index.php/Impact_of_background_traffic_testing_with_kernel_2.6.18-rc4</a><br>
<br>Stability of high-speed protocols (CUBIC, BIC, HTCP, HSTCP, STCP, FAST, TCP-SACK and Westwood)<br>Paper: <a href="http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/rhee/export/stochastic-ordering.pdf">http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/rhee/export/stochastic-ordering.pdf</a><br>
Results: <a href="http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/convex-ordering/">http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/convex-ordering/</a><br><br>Fairness, convergence time, RTT fairness, and TCP friendliness with and without background traffic<br>(CUBIC, BIC, HTCP, HSTCP, STCP, FAST and TCP-SACK)<br>
Tech Report: <a href="http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/rhee/export/bitcp/asteppaper.htm">http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/rhee/export/bitcp/asteppaper.htm</a><br>Results: <a href="http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/highspeed">http://netsrv.csc.ncsu.edu/highspeed</a><br>
<br>Rebuttal to CUBIC analysis paper at PFLDnet 2007<br><a href="http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/rhee/Rebuttal-LSM-new.pdf">http://www.csc.ncsu.edu/faculty/rhee/Rebuttal-LSM-new.pdf</a><br><br><br>Sangtae<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Vinayak Hegde <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:vinayakh@gmail.com">vinayakh@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Are there any good references online (or research papers) that compare<br>
and contrast current (or recent implementations) of congestion<br>
algorithms in Linux/freebsd such as TCP Vegas, Reno, bic, cubic etc.<br>
Also what works best for long haul high latency networks would be<br>
helpful.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
-- Vinayak<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>