<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7653.38">
<TITLE>RE: [e2e] Protocols breaking the end-to-end argument</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>> 3. End-to-End Args proposes applying the notion of smart, reliable<BR>
> endpoints communicating over unreliable comms system to all sorts of<BR>
> other things as a rhetorical trick.<BR>
<BR>
Reed's comment on rhetoric bringing structure to logical argument<BR>
has nothing to do with a paper doing engineering analysis and<BR>
drawing insights from commonalities.<BR>
<BR>
(I would submit that to fully understand its arguments and internalize<BR>
its concepts, an engineering mindset is required.)<BR>
<BR>
<<A HREF="http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/">http://www.ee.surrey.ac.uk/Personal/L.Wood/</A>><L.Wood@surrey.ac.uk><BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>