[e2e] What's wrong with this picture?
detlef.bosau at web.de
Fri Sep 11 11:07:03 PDT 2009
Lloyd Wood wrote:
> On 11 Sep 2009, at 16:29, David P. Reed wrote:
>> Scott Bradner told me that it is common for ISPs to write contracts
>> to layer 2 equipment vendors that state "Never drop packets".
> We wrote RFC3366, which says "don't do that."
Hm. I think, particularly Dave will agree when I say we should pursue
_short_ transmission times and rather should leave a packet undelivered
than do excessive retransmissions.
This is one reason why I think that the (often claimed "strong")
difference between congestion drop and corruption drop is a bit academic
Is it possible, that we encounter a combination of excessive buffering,
excessive retransmission and volative path conditions here?
Detlef Bosau Galileistraße 30 70565 Stuttgart
phone: +49 711 5208031 mobile: +49 172 6819937 skype: detlef.bosau
ICQ: 566129673 http://firstname.lastname@example.org
More information about the end2end-interest