[e2e] 0% NAT - checkmating the disconnectors
gds at best.com
Fri Mar 10 19:35:20 PST 2006
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 10:09:47AM -0500, David P. Reed wrote:
> Tell me exactly how does allowing an application that a network owner
> does not like (perhaps promoting abortion for all or advocating murder
> of abortionists, depending on your preferences for extremism, or
> perhaps just charging usurious rates of interest or promoting gift
> economies) "damage the network"?
I went back and reread Saikat's paper. I did not view his remarks in
the light that you seem to. I read them as "a network operator would
like to protect his network from abuse, and enable its authorized
users to freely communicate."
More information about the end2end-interest